Media

IPN Opinion article

January 11, 2001
Incorporating the precautionary principle into policymaking is sometimes represented as "erring on the side of safety" or as faithful to the maxim "better safe than sorry"óthe underlying assumption being that underregulation of risky activities could result in severe harm to human health or the environment, whereas "overregulation" causes little or no harm. This assumption is false. Typically, the precautionary principle is applied to R&D and to commercial products in a way that can increase risk. Indeed, governmental exercise of the precautionary principle has not only laid waste to several industriesóit has also resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of human lives.

IPN Opinion article

January 6, 2001
"Potential risks should, of course, be taken into consideration before proceeding with any new activity or product, whether it is the siting of a power plant or the introduction of a new drug into the pharmacy. But the precautionary principle focuses solely on the possibility that technologies could pose unique, extreme, or unmanageable risks, even after considerable testing has already been conducted. What is missing from precautionary calculus is an acknowledgment that even when technologies introduce new risks, most confer net benefits ó that is, their use reduces many other, often far more serious, hazards. Examples include blood transfusions, mri scans, and automobile air bags, all of which offer immense benefits and only minimal risk."

IPN Opinion article

January 5, 2001

IPN Opinion article

January 8, 2000
"In his conversation with Madhu Kishwar, Dr Mashelkar opens up to questions that range from his personal life to his concerns about the future of Indian R&D. He demythifies concepts such as international patents and intellectual property, voices his concerns about the neglect of traditional knowledge systems in the developing world and projects, a scenario of vast opportunities for wealth generation; all this in a manner that is down-to-earth, enthusiastic and optimistic."

IPN Opinion article

April 3, 1997
\"The problem with the ending of patent protection, though, is that in the long term we all lose, especially those in developing countries. And that will be the outcome if the pharmaceutical companies fail in their attempt starting on March 5 in Pretoria High Court to overturn legislation that allows patent-breaking anti-AIDS drugs to be imported from India...\"

IPN Opinion article

February 3, 1997
\"Precaution is a sensible prudential attitude. But the widespread adoption of the precautionary principle poses unexpected dangers.\"

IPN Opinion article

July 31, 1996
"In his conversation with Madhu Kishwar, Dr Mashelkar opens up to questions that range from his personal life to his concerns about the future of Indian R&D. He demythifies concepts such as international patents and intellectual property, voices his concerns about the neglect of traditional knowledge systems in the developing world and projects, a scenario of vast opportunities for wealth generation; all this in a manner that is down-to-earth, enthusiastic and optimistic."