Why oil should not be EAC’s curse
IPN Opinion article
Business Daily (Kenya)
Dreams of petrodollars have followed the discovery of oil and gas in commercial quantities in Uganda, but the bonanza could make or break the fledgling East African Community Common Market — either opening up its new free market or strengthening state intervention and visiting the dreaded “resource curse” on us all.
Oil reserves are expected to reach five billion barrels and what has been found so far — 700 million barrels — is currently worth $50billion.
For rough comparison, this is two-thirds of the current combined annual gross domestic product (GDP) of the East Africa Community (EAC), some $73 billion between Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi.
Exploration in Kenya has intensified in the four large sedimentary basins of Lamu, Anza, Mandera and the Rift Valley.
In Tanzania there are indications of hydrocarbon potential but little exploration: the biggest discoveries have been the Songo Songo and the Mnazi Bay gas fields.
In Rwanda, oil exploration is taking place in the Kivu Graben, part of the great western East African System.
It is clear that landlocked Uganda alone has more energy than it or the region can use, so neighbours stand to gain from exports because Uganda needs pipelines to the sea, either to Mombasa in Kenya, or Tanga or Dar es Salaam in Tanzania.
Integrating the infrastructure throughout the EAC is essential to bringing down costs to compete with the efficient (therefore cheap) Gulf wells and refineries.
So far there are oil and gas pipelines being laid between Dar es Salaam, Tanga and Mombasa, and the extension of the Mombasa to Kampala oil pipeline to Kigali and Bujumbura.
The known and projected reserves seem adequate for the EAC and the Great Lakes region’s own consumption for 30 years at present levels but there is little local refining.
The refinery in Mombasa processes 1.6 million tonnes of crude oil annually, but total regional demand is five million tonnes.
Iran proposes building a refinery in Uganda but the government wants China’s CNOOC, France’s Total or the Irish/UK Tullow Oil (or all together) to build a three-million-tonne-a-year refinery because they have the experience and resources for a one-to-two-billion-dollar plant: the scale of modern refineries requires building for the region rather than single countries. Some Asian countries including China are keen to invest too.
But massive expansion will demand massive investment and massive improvement in business conditions for foreign investors, including harmonised EAC investment and exploration rules to give investors legal mechanisms for prospecting, building and transporting across national borders.
Special legal and fiscal regimes have already attracted an increase in exploration bids but there is much to be done, especially for other kinds of businesses that do not involve hundreds of millions of dollars
Governments must also remove the obstacles to creating and running businesses so everyone can benefit from the promised EAC free market.
Right now EAC members, except very low-ranked Burundi, are within the top third of the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business list for sub-Saharan Africa — but even the best, Rwanda, is only just within the top third worldwide.
EAC members must live up to their promises of allowing region-wide free trade and movement for all products and services, so efficient markets can develop rapidly, not just in oil.
Energy could drive robust and sustainable economic growth in East Africa but only if coupled with economic freedom, lower corruption and better business conditions for all.
The big bucks of energy could help open up the EAC Common Market, which starts on July 1, and remove some of the world’s highest tariff barriers, or they could become entangled in state meddling and cronyism.
The energy bonanza can be a blessing instead of the resource-curse that has propped up repressive regimes and impoverished so many Africans.
Ibrahim Kasita is a business reporter on the Ugandan daily New Vision.